AI-assistant queries are not a census of marketer behaviour

Editorial collage hero (rust-slate): AI ASSISTANT QUERIES. CENSUS MARKETER BEHAVIOUR

A product-usage percentage needs its own population card before it becomes an industry claim.

AppsFlyer reports that 46% of AI-assistant queries concerned reporting and performance breakdowns. A query share does not mean that 46% of marketers use AI primarily for reporting.Vendor release.

Identify who can enter the denominator

Product telemetry can reveal how a particular tool is used. It may also reflect the tasks that tool makes easy, the customers who have access and repeated activity by a small set of frequent users. These are reasons to ask about sampling, not evidence that the reported share is wrong.

Our recommendation is to keep query counts, active accounts and unique users in separate columns. A team evaluating its own assistant can then distinguish broad adoption from intensive use by a few specialists. Also separate completed work from prompts submitted: repeated attempts may increase query volume without increasing useful output.

Use the finding as a workflow question

The gaming report page places the finding in a wider marketing analysis, but does not make it an independent survey of every AI workflow. The card records the missing account and user denominators explicitly.

For a studio, the actionable question is whether reporting work is repetitive, well-defined and verifiable enough to improve with assistance. Measure time saved and correction effort on actual tasks before treating usage as value. The external percentage can suggest a place to investigate; it cannot establish a staffing saving or the quality of an automated decision.

Inspect the evidence

Download the source-population and comparability card. The extraction separates documented facts from our analysis and unknowns.

FieldEvidence or limit
Report / publisherState of Gaming for Marketers 2026 — release and methodology / AppsFlyer
Period2025 report context
PopulationAI-assistant query population described by AppsFlyer; user count unknown
Metric under review46% of AI-assistant queries concerned reporting and performance breakdowns
AggregationShare of queries; account weighting unknown
Critical limitUnique user count, repeat-query treatment and coverage of other AI tools are not disclosed.
Comparable withA query-level usage study with the same classification and user coverage
Not comparable withAn unmatched game, period, metric definition or acquisition mix

Further reading in the existing archive: AI Creative Testing Volume Benchmarks for Mid-2025; The benchmark report is selling you something. These links provide background; this check does not independently verify their full contents.

Frequently asked questions

How should UA teams read AppsFlyer’s AI-assistant query share when it is not a census of marketer behaviour?

Keep a product-usage percentage on its own population card before promoting it to an industry claim. AppsFlyer reports that 46% of AI-assistant queries concerned reporting and performance breakdowns — a query share does not mean that 46% of marketers use AI primarily for reporting. Product telemetry can reveal how a particular tool is used; it may also reflect the tasks that tool makes easy, the customers who have access, and repeated activity by a small set of frequent users. Keep query counts, active accounts and unique users in separate columns; also separate completed work from prompts submitted, because repeated attempts may increase query volume without increasing useful output. The gaming-report page places the finding in a wider marketing analysis but does not make it an independent survey of every AI workflow. For a studio, the actionable question is whether reporting work is repetitive, well-defined and verifiable enough to improve with assistance — measure time saved and correction effort on actual tasks before treating usage as value. The external percentage can suggest a place to investigate; it cannot establish a staffing saving or the quality of an automated decision.

Related posts

Lunar New Year UA gates from an official calendar, not a CPI myth

market intelligence

media buying

·

1 min read

Lunar New Year UA gates from an official calendar, not a CPI myth

WeChat Mini Games upgrades 2026 IAP / virtual-payment incentives for debut titles

market intelligence

media buying

·

2 min read

WeChat Mini Games upgrades 2026 IAP / virtual-payment incentives for debut titles

WeChat Mini Games IAA incentives from 20 August 2026: 3-minute lifetime, 180-day option

market intelligence

media buying

·

2 min read

WeChat Mini Games IAA incentives from 20 August 2026: 3-minute lifetime, 180-day option