Xiaomi HyperOS developer docs list game anti-addiction and ad mis-tap violation tiers

Xiaomi HyperOS developer documentation 应用和开发者分级管理制度, page update stamp 2026-09-11 21:38:00 on the body opened 20 September 2026, grades application and developer violations for apps running on HyperOS. The rules apply to the full HyperOS app set, including games distributed through Xiaomi store surfaces. Violations accumulate on a rolling near-365-day window.

Anti-addiction and advertising rows

Within the L2-1 band, item 17 is 游戏缺少防沉迷实名认证 — games that have not implemented anti-addiction and real-name authentication. Item 19 is 广告诱导点击 — ads that induce or deceive users into involuntary downloads or jumps. The page’s examples for item 19 include forced or misleading taps such as “claim”, “close”, “no more reminders”, or cash-red-packet bait. Adjacent L2-1 advertising rows also cover ad-bundled downloads (item 18). Higher bands list further ad harms (bad content, fraud, SDK privacy abuse, induced billing) with escalating take-down outcomes; this card’s UA focus is the L2-1 anti-addiction and mis-tap rows that most often hit live IAA games.

Handling

L2-1 handling on the same page includes keeping the app in its current state with a 14-day remediation window, limiting internal store exposure, surfacing problem notices to users across HyperOS, pausing related developer services, and notifying the developer by email and developer-site popup. L2-2 moves to take-down with a 14-day fix window; L3/L4 take-down and freeze, with L4 and regulator-ordered removals listed among non-appealable cases. Developer credit grades (V0–V3) can freeze an entire account when repeated L2-2/L3/L4 issues stack.

Operator implication

Download the violation-tier card. Xiaomi UA scale remains contingent on anti-addiction compliance and non-deceptive ad UX under this grading table.

Research checked 20 September 2026. Local draft; human editorial review pending.