Rewarded opt-in rate decay across a 14-day cohort (labelled synthetic)

Analysis

By Isaac Turner, Measurement Editor2 min read

View author profile
Rewarded opt-in rate decay across a 14-day cohort (labelled synthetic)

Method lab: rewarded opt-in rate by cohort day with labelled synthetic inputs plus AdMob’s rewarded-ad definition. Not an industry average.

Fatigue in hybrid and IAA-heavy titles often shows first as a falling rewarded opt-in rate, before CPI moves. AdMob rewarded ads define the format as ads that reward users with in-app items for interacting with video, playable or survey ads, with an OnUserEarnedRewardListener when the reward is earned. That is a product definition, not a retention benchmark.

This lab uses labelled synthetic cohort inputs. It is a method worksheet, not a claim about your live title.

Define the metric before using it

  • Eligible session: session where a rewarded placement was offered (studio event).
  • Opt-in: user started the rewarded experience (studio event; not the same as reward grant).
  • Opt-in rate (day d): opt-ins on cohort day d ÷ eligible sessions on day d.
  • Decay (d0→d14): 1 − (rate_d14 ÷ rate_d0), when rate_d0 > 0.

Map reward grants and impression revenue separately via your mediation/MMP path (for example AppsFlyer’s af_ad_revenue event in the ad revenue attribution guide). Do not treat reward grant as IAP.

Synthetic worked example

Reference table
Cohort dayEligible sessionsOpt-insOpt-in rate
010004200.420
37002450.350
75001500.300
14350840.240

Decay d0→d14 = 1 − (0.240 / 0.420) = 0.4286 (42.86%).

Reference table
OutputResultEquation
rate_d00.4200420/1000
rate_d140.240084/350
decay_d0_d140.42861 − rate_d14/rate_d0

Facts versus limits

Reference table
FactLimit
AdMob documents rewarded ads and reward callbacksDocs do not publish opt-in decay norms
MMP ad-revenue events exist for attributed IAAEvent presence ≠ fatigue diagnosis
Synthetic arithmetic is reproducibleNot a genre benchmark or CPI forecast

Download the CSV. Replace synthetic rows with your export; keep the equations fixed.

Research checked 20 September 2026. Local draft; human editorial review pending. Author null.

Featured

Related posts

measurement

media buying

·

1 min read

Using predicted LTV in bids: disclosure checklist for the UA team

measurement

media buying

·

1 min read

Blended ROAS targets that hide channel failure in F2P portfolios

measurement

media buying

·

2 min read

Web-shop LTV with VAT-inclusive prices versus store net proceeds (labelled synthetic)

measurement

media buying

·

1 min read

View-through attribution windows on F2P rewarded and interstitial traffic

More from the Measurement desk

measurement

·

2 min read

Airbridge adds Amazon Ads as an app measurement channel

measurement

·

2 min read

When to freeze a cohort for payback review (and when not to)

measurement

·

1 min read

Web-shop purchaser quality vs store IAP purchaser quality

measurement

·

1 min read

Web-shop attributed revenue in MMP vs payment-provider settlements