Creative fatigue as a decay curve: labelled teaching data, not a market law

Analysis

By UA Ledger staff2 min read

Creative fatigue as a decay curve: labelled teaching data, not a market law

Frequency can rise while IPM falls without proving the asset is ‘dead’. A reproducible synthetic example with editable inputs and explicit limits.

Frequency can rise while IPM falls without proving the asset is ‘dead’. This lab fits a simple decay to the reader’s own points so the assumption is visible.

Define the calculation before using it

Enter baseline IPM at frequency one, observed IPM at a later frequency, and that later frequency. Compute a constant per-step multiplier that connects the two points. Apply it only as a scenario, not as a forecast.

Work through the synthetic example

A baseline IPM of 12 at frequency 1 and 6 at frequency 4 implies a per-step multiplier of 0.7937. That describes those two teaching points. It does not establish a genre benchmark or an optimal refresh day.

Reference table
OutputWorked-example result
Per-step multiplier0.7937
Implied IPM at frequency 29.5244

Use the artifact and preserve its assumptions

Open the editable calculator to change the inputs and inspect the sensitivity view. The CSV records synthetic inputs and expected outputs; the JSON fixture keeps the equations available for reproduction. These calculations have been checked against the stated example. No measured campaign data is included.

The sensitivity rows vary only ipmN by 20% below and above the entered value. They are scenarios, not confidence limits or a forecast distribution. A row outside the model’s constraints is labelled rather than turned into a plausible-looking result.

Evidence and limits

Google documents frequency as impressions per user over a period, and capping as a control. It does not publish a universal IPM decay function for game ads. See About frequency capping, especially “Frequency capping”.

Two points cannot identify a true decay process. Auction mix, audience exhaustion and creative concept changes are out of scope.

Background: Anatomy of a creative that scaled, then died and The creative brief is a hypothesis document. These existing articles provide context; the present calculation does not verify every archived claim.

Draft prepared 19 September 2026. Synthetic teaching example; human editorial and specialist review pending. No actual campaign outcome or recommended industry default is claimed.

Featured

Related posts

creative strategy

measurement

·

1 min read

Hook-level holdout for SLG war creatives during a season peak

creative strategy

measurement

·

1 min read

Cohort quality: D1 retention vs D7 payer rate divergence lab

creative strategy

measurement

·

1 min read

Creative concept half-life by F2P genre (operator method, labelled synthetic)

creative strategy

measurement

·

1 min read

Country mix shift: standardising F2P ROAS before declaring creative win

More from the Creative Strategy desk

creative strategy

·

1 min read

UK ASA loot-box disclosure in ads and store listings

creative strategy

media buying

·

1 min read

India real-money adjacency: what a casual F2P ad must not imply

creative strategy

media buying

·

1 min read

Publish the 2026 festival calendar to UA 60 days out

creative strategy

media buying

·

1 min read

Amplify Spark or Branded Mission UGC before cutting a studio remake